top of page

Article title: Mapping the infectious burden in VEXAS syndrome:a systematic review and rationale for prevention

First author: Valentine Ribier

Journal: Lancet Rheumatology

Author of the abstract: Rim BOURGUIBA


Le syndrome VEXAS et le risque d’infections : que sait-on et comment les éviter ?


Introduction:

VEXAS syndrome is an autoinflammatory disease associated with somatic mutations in the X‑linked UBA1 gene. Patients present with systemic inflammatory manifestations and an increased susceptibility to infections. In the French cohort, more than 50% of mortality was attributed to infections. Several factors have been identified as contributors to infection risk in these patients: long‑term corticosteroid therapy, combination and prolonged use of immunosuppressive treatments such as JAK inhibitors, and a likely functional immune deficiency of myeloid cells related to the disease itself. Multiple publications have reported opportunistic and invasive infections in VEXAS even in the absence of immunosuppressive or immunomodulatory therapy. Few recommendations existed regarding infection prophylaxis in VEXAS. The objectives of this review were: 1) to characterize the spectrum of infections in VEXAS, 2) to identify a high‑risk subgroup for infections, and 3) to propose a preventive strategy to reduce infection‑related complications.


Methods:

This systematic review followed PRISMA guidelines. The literature search included publications from October 2020 to October 31, 2024 without language restrictions on PubMed. The authors included case reports and case series. Eligibility criteria were the presence of infection, its frequency, and its nature among patients with VEXAS syndrome. Infection was confirmed when a pathogen was identified. A severe infection was defined as one requiring hospitalization with intravenous antibiotic therapy or resulting in death.


Results:

The authors identified 506 potentially eligible studies; after exclusions, 57 studies were retained, encompassing 813 patients.


Infection frequency was high: 37–60% of patients experienced at least one infection, with 12–15% dying from infections in large cohorts. Severe infections accounted for up to 60% of cases. The most frequent infection sites were respiratory (28–59%), skin and soft tissue (10–49%), and bloodstream (bacteremia 8–13%), with genitourinary and gastrointestinal infections less common. Main pathogens included bacteria (Gram‑negative bacilli and Gram‑positive cocci), and opportunistic infections such as Legionella, atypical mycobacteria, Pneumocystis jirovecii, VZV, CMV, HSV, Aspergillus, and Nocardia. (Figure 1)


Factors associated with infections included exposure to immunosuppressive treatments: azacitidine was associated with 44–62% infections, including deaths; IL‑6 inhibitors with 29–47%; and JAK inhibitors with 18–37%. IL‑1 inhibitors were associated with a lower rate (3%). Chronic corticosteroid therapy was associated with mycobacterial infections or pneumocystosis.


The authors proposed the following prevention strategy:


  • Targeted anti‑infective prophylaxis, for example co‑trimoxazole to prevent Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia and valaciclovir to prevent VZV reactivation.

  • Systematic vaccinations, including influenza, pneumococcus, VZV, and SARS‑CoV‑2, despite a potential for reduced vaccine responses.

  • Comprehensive infectious disease screening before initiating immunosuppression, including serologies (HIV, HBV, HCV, TB) and chest CT.


Conclusion:

VEXAS syndrome is associated with a major predisposition to infections, resulting from both an intrinsic immune deficit linked to UBA1 mutation and the effects of immunosuppressive treatments. Infections are a leading cause of morbidity and mortality, particularly affecting the respiratory tract and skin. Prevention should be a central pillar of care, based on vaccination, targeted anti‑infective prophylaxis, and risk assessment prior to any immunosuppression. These data support an integrated, multidisciplinary, and proactive approach to improve survival and quality of life for people living with VEXAS.


Figure 1: Distribution of infection sites and pathogens across studies

Répartition des sites infectieux et des germes pathogènes selon les différentes études

 
 
 

Summarized by: Sophie GEORGIN LAVIALLE

Reference: Bixio R, The role of 18FDG–PET imaging in VEXAS syndrome: a multicentric case series and a systematic review of the literature, Internal and Emergency Medicine, 2024 Nov;19(8):2331-2345.

Rôle de l’imagerie TEP au 18FDG dans le syndrome VEXAS

Summary:

Introduction:

VEXAS syndrome (Vacuoles, E1 enzyme, X-linked, Autoinflammatory, Somatic) is an autoinflammatory disease associated with somatic mutations in the UBA1 gene. Patients typically present with systemic symptoms (fever, weight loss, skin rashes, lung involvement, chondritis, vasculitis, etc.), macrocytic anemia, and often a myelodysplastic syndrome. Given the clinical heterogeneity and lack of established diagnostic criteria, 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET (18FDG–PET) imaging may help with diagnosis and disease monitoring.


Patients and Methods:

This article reports a multicenter Italian case series of 8 patients, combined with a systematic review of the literature, totaling 35 cases.


Results:

All patients were male, with a median age of 70 years. The most common mutations were Met41Thr, Met41Val, and Met41Leu. The main indication for PET imaging was to investigate inflammatory foci or rule out malignancy.

PET scan analysis showed a high prevalence of bone marrow hypermetabolism (77%), followed by lymph nodes (35%), lungs (29%), spleen, large vessels, and cartilage (23% and 20% respectively). In six cases, PET imaging performed before diagnosis already showed increased bone marrow uptake. In some patients, follow-up PET scans after treatment (glucocorticoids or JAK inhibitors) revealed a reduction or even disappearance of hypermetabolic foci.

The authors also provide a summary diagram of the main lesions (see next page).


Conclusion:

Although no specific uptake pattern was identified, bone marrow hypermetabolism may precede clinical manifestations, suggesting a potential role for PET imaging in the early diagnosis and monitoring of VEXAS syndrome. Additionally, PET scans can assist in excluding differential diagnoses, especially malignancies and infections.

 
 
 
Article title : VEXAS syndrome through a rheumatologist's lens: insights from a Spanish national cohortservices de rhumatologie espagnols
First author: García-Escudero P

First author: Rheumatology

Auteur du résumé: Philippe Mertz


Le syndrome VEXAS : une recherche nationale espagnole pour mieux comprendre cette maladie rare.


Introduction

VEXAS syndrome (Vacuoles, E1 enzyme, X‑linked, Autoinflammatory, Somatic) is a recently described, severe autoinflammatory disease associated with somatic variants in the UBA1 gene. It primarily affects men over 50 and combines systemic inflammatory manifestations with hematologic abnormalities. The aim of this study was to describe the clinical and genetic features of VEXAS seen in patients followed in Spanish rheumatology departments and to analyze genotype–phenotype correlations.


Methods

This was a multicenter retrospective study conducted in 126 Spanish hospitals, including 39 patients diagnosed between December 2020 and January 2024. Clinical, laboratory, and genetic data were collected and analyzed.


Key results

All patients were men, with a mean age of 73 years (range 40–92) at diagnosis. Initial working diagnoses included seronegative polyarthritis (9/39), relapsing polychondritis (6/39), Sweet’s syndrome (4/39), polymyalgia rheumatica (4/39), systemic lupus, and medium‑vessel vasculitis (3/39 each). The most frequent clinical features were skin involvement (87%), followed by polyarthritis (82%) and fever (79%). Renal involvement affected 20% of patients, a higher rate than previously reported cohorts, and polyarthritis also appeared more frequent than in earlier series.

Genetically, notable correlations emerged. The UBA1 M41V variant was significantly associated with renal involvement, whereas M41T correlated with thrombocytopenia and an increased rate of thromboembolic events. The study also identified a potentially pathogenic novel UBA1 variant (c.209T>A; p.L70H).

Regarding treatment, all patients received corticosteroids, with better responses observed after diagnostic confirmation and dose adjustments. Interleukin‑6 inhibitors and JAK inhibitors, notably ruxolitinib, showed the highest response rates, reaching 75% and 76% respectively. In contrast, anti‑TNF agents and hypomethylating agents were largely ineffective.


Conclusion

This study confirms that VEXAS remains under‑recognized in rheumatology, particularly among older men presenting with polyarthritis, unexplained cytopenias, or steroid dependence. It also underscores that genotype influences clinical expression, with certain variants associated with more severe disease or specific complications such as renal or thromboembolic involvement. Finally, the results support JAK and IL‑6 inhibitors as key therapeutic strategies in this condition.

In clinical practice, these findings support considering VEXAS promptly in any man over 50 with seronegative polyarthritis and atypical systemic features, cytopenias, or steroid dependence, to avoid diagnostic delay and better tailor therapy.



 
 
 
bottom of page