English title: Epidemiology and clinical presentation of kidney amyloidosis have changed over the past three decades: a nationwide population-based study
First author: Hilde J. Vasstrand
Journal : BMC Nephrology
Reference : BMC Nephrol. 2025 Jun 2;26(1):272.
PubMed link : https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40457206/
Article summarized by: Dr Catherine Grandpeix-Guyodo

Introduction:
Amyloidoses are diseases related to protein deposits in the form of amyloid fibrils. Protein typing helps understand the presentation of the disease, its progression, prognosis, and allows treatment adaptation. Early diagnosis of kidney amyloidosis is essential for treatment optimization and prognosis improvement. This Norwegian nationwide study conducted over 30 years explores changes in the epidemiology and clinical presentation of kidney amyloidosis to raise awareness about these conditions.
Patients and methods: Over a 30-year period, 479 patients with amyloidosis on kidney biopsy were identified in the registries, including 209 AA amyloidoses (SAA protein deposits) and 270 non-AA amyloidoses (mainly AL amyloidoses from immunoglobulin light chain deposits). Patient records were studied and cases were separated into AA amyloidosis and non-AA amyloidosis.
Results:
The frequency of renal amyloidosis was stable over time (4% of kidney biopsies), but AL amyloidosis became the predominant form of non-AA amyloidoses with a frequency increasing from 1.9% to 2.8% of kidney biopsies (p = 0.014). In parallel, the proportion of AA amyloidosis decreased from 2.6% to 1.3% (p < 0.001), due to the reduction in amyloidoses secondary to inflammatory rheumatic diseases, partly offset by AA amyloidoses secondary to drug injections.
Advances in typing amyloid deposits significantly reduced undetermined amyloidoses (p < 0.001) and led to more precise diagnoses. Clinical presentations were varied, but proteinuria was present in 94% of patients. Nephrotic syndrome was noted more frequently in patients with non-AA amyloidosis (70%) than in those with AA amyloidosis (51%). Kidney function was better preserved in non-AA amyloidoses (median GFR 53 ml/min/1.73 m²) than in AA amyloidoses (median GFR 27 ml/min/1.73 m²). Patients with AA amyloidosis were younger (p < 0.001) and more often hypertensive (53% versus 38%, p < 0.001).
Regarding patients developing AA amyloidosis following drug injection, they were younger, more often male, and presented more advanced kidney disease with half in end-stage kidney disease.
Recently, the authors noted that patients with non-AA amyloidosis had better albumin, hemoglobin, and ESR levels (p < 0.05). Additionally, the proportion of non-AA amyloidosis with end-stage kidney disease dropped from 26.8% to 8.7% (p = 0.005), which could indicate earlier diagnoses.
Conclusion:
There have been changes in the epidemiology of kidney amyloidosis in Norway over the past 30 years. The rate of non-AA amyloidosis in biopsies has increased, and certain indicators suggest that diagnosis is made earlier. Amyloid typing has improved, which is reflected in more precise diagnoses with a decrease in undetermined forms. AA amyloidoses related to inflammatory rheumatic diseases have significantly decreased, but the increase in AA amyloidoses in patients who inject drugs is becoming a growing problem.
Awareness of amyloidoses remains necessary, especially during this period when epidemiology is changing with, as a consequence, the possibility of changes in clinical presentation and therapeutic needs.



