top of page

Article title: Mapping the infectious burden in VEXAS syndrome:a systematic review and rationale for prevention

First author: Valentine Ribier

Journal: Lancet Rheumatology

Author of the abstract: Rim BOURGUIBA


Le syndrome VEXAS et le risque d’infections : que sait-on et comment les éviter ?


Introduction:

VEXAS syndrome is an autoinflammatory disease associated with somatic mutations in the X‑linked UBA1 gene. Patients present with systemic inflammatory manifestations and an increased susceptibility to infections. In the French cohort, more than 50% of mortality was attributed to infections. Several factors have been identified as contributors to infection risk in these patients: long‑term corticosteroid therapy, combination and prolonged use of immunosuppressive treatments such as JAK inhibitors, and a likely functional immune deficiency of myeloid cells related to the disease itself. Multiple publications have reported opportunistic and invasive infections in VEXAS even in the absence of immunosuppressive or immunomodulatory therapy. Few recommendations existed regarding infection prophylaxis in VEXAS. The objectives of this review were: 1) to characterize the spectrum of infections in VEXAS, 2) to identify a high‑risk subgroup for infections, and 3) to propose a preventive strategy to reduce infection‑related complications.


Methods:

This systematic review followed PRISMA guidelines. The literature search included publications from October 2020 to October 31, 2024 without language restrictions on PubMed. The authors included case reports and case series. Eligibility criteria were the presence of infection, its frequency, and its nature among patients with VEXAS syndrome. Infection was confirmed when a pathogen was identified. A severe infection was defined as one requiring hospitalization with intravenous antibiotic therapy or resulting in death.


Results:

The authors identified 506 potentially eligible studies; after exclusions, 57 studies were retained, encompassing 813 patients.


Infection frequency was high: 37–60% of patients experienced at least one infection, with 12–15% dying from infections in large cohorts. Severe infections accounted for up to 60% of cases. The most frequent infection sites were respiratory (28–59%), skin and soft tissue (10–49%), and bloodstream (bacteremia 8–13%), with genitourinary and gastrointestinal infections less common. Main pathogens included bacteria (Gram‑negative bacilli and Gram‑positive cocci), and opportunistic infections such as Legionella, atypical mycobacteria, Pneumocystis jirovecii, VZV, CMV, HSV, Aspergillus, and Nocardia. (Figure 1)


Factors associated with infections included exposure to immunosuppressive treatments: azacitidine was associated with 44–62% infections, including deaths; IL‑6 inhibitors with 29–47%; and JAK inhibitors with 18–37%. IL‑1 inhibitors were associated with a lower rate (3%). Chronic corticosteroid therapy was associated with mycobacterial infections or pneumocystosis.


The authors proposed the following prevention strategy:


  • Targeted anti‑infective prophylaxis, for example co‑trimoxazole to prevent Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia and valaciclovir to prevent VZV reactivation.

  • Systematic vaccinations, including influenza, pneumococcus, VZV, and SARS‑CoV‑2, despite a potential for reduced vaccine responses.

  • Comprehensive infectious disease screening before initiating immunosuppression, including serologies (HIV, HBV, HCV, TB) and chest CT.


Conclusion:

VEXAS syndrome is associated with a major predisposition to infections, resulting from both an intrinsic immune deficit linked to UBA1 mutation and the effects of immunosuppressive treatments. Infections are a leading cause of morbidity and mortality, particularly affecting the respiratory tract and skin. Prevention should be a central pillar of care, based on vaccination, targeted anti‑infective prophylaxis, and risk assessment prior to any immunosuppression. These data support an integrated, multidisciplinary, and proactive approach to improve survival and quality of life for people living with VEXAS.


Figure 1: Distribution of infection sites and pathogens across studies

Répartition des sites infectieux et des germes pathogènes selon les différentes études

 
 
 

First author: Yixiang Yves-Jean Zhu

Journal: European Journal of Internal Medicine


VEXAS syndrome: A comprehensive review of cases across different ethnicities

Vacuoles, E1 enzyme, X-linked, autoinflammatory, somatic (VEXAS) syndrome is a rare autoinflammatory disease associated with somatic pathogenic variants in the UBA1 gene. First described in 2020, it has since been reported in many countries, but its distribution across the world remained unclear. We conducted a literature review between October 2020 and April 2025, identifying more than 670 cases across 32 countries and 4 continents. Among patients with documented origins, several ethnic groups were represented, including Caucasian, East and South Asian, Middle Eastern, and South American. These findings confirm that VEXAS syndrome diverse ethnic backgrounds and has a broad worldwide distribution. It is therefore crucial to consider VEXAS in patients with compatible symptoms, regardless of their country or ancestry, to avoid diagnostic delays.



 
 
 

Summarized by: le Pr Sophie Georgin-Lavialle

Reference: Garcia-Escudero P, VEXAS syndrome through a rheumatologist’s lens: insights from a Spanish national cohort, Rheumatology, 2025, 00, 1-9

Le syndrome VEXAS vu par un rhumatologue : enseignements tirés d'une cohorte nationale espagnole

Summary:

VEXAS syndrome is a rare, acquired autoinflammatory disease first described in 2020, associated with somatic mutations in the UBA1 gene. This article presents a Spanish multicenter case series of 39 Caucasian male patients followed in rheumatology, with a mean age at diagnosis of 73 years and an average age at symptom onset of 67. Prior diagnoses included seronegative polyarthritis (n=9), relapsing polychondritis (n=6), Sweet syndrome (n=4), polymyalgia rheumatica (n=4), systemic lupus erythematosus (n=3), and medium-vessel vasculitis (n=3). The most frequent clinical features, in decreasing order, were skin lesions (87%)—mainly neutrophilic dermatosis—polyarthritis (82%), fever (79%), chondritis (51.3%), ophthalmologic involvement (48.7%) mainly periorbital edema, pulmonary involvement (38%), deep vein thrombosis (30.8%), and renal involvement (20%).


From a hematological perspective, 92% of patients had macrocytic anemia, and 46% had myelodysplastic syndrome. A monoclonal gammopathy was present in 25.6% of cases. Cytoplasmic vacuoles were found in 82% of patients.


The three main UBA1 mutations identified were M41T (36%), M41V (15.7%), and M41L (47%). A genotype-phenotype correlation was observed: M41V was associated with renal involvement, and M41T with deep vein thrombosis and thrombocytopenia. A novel mutation (c.209T>A; p.L70H) in exon 4 was also reported.


Most patients presented with macrocytic anemia (92%), sometimes associated with myelodysplasia (46%) or monoclonal gammopathy (26%). Bone marrow examination showed vacuoles in 72% of cases.


All patients received corticosteroids, with significant improvement after diagnosis, likely due to increased doses. IL-6 inhibitors (75%) and JAK inhibitors (77%)—especially ruxolitinib (90%)—showed good efficacy. TNF inhibitors were ineffective.


Eight patients (20.5%) died during follow-up, with 5 deaths directly attributed to VEXAS syndrome.


This study highlights the crucial role of rheumatologists in identifying VEXAS syndrome, particularly in men over 50 with atypical inflammatory presentations, macrocytic anemia, and corticosteroid dependence. The described genotype-phenotype correlations may be validated in larger cohorts and could help refine diagnostic strategies and guide treatment choices.




 
 
 
bottom of page