top of page
Evaluation de l’efficacité des inhibiteurs d’interleukine 1 sur les douleurs de jambes à l’orthostatisme des patients atteints de Fièvre Méditerranéenne Familiale (FMF)


Key points:

- Exertional/orthostatic leg pain is a frequent complaint in FMF patients with severe phenotypes.

- This lower-limb pain impacts quality of life.

- Interleukin‑1 inhibitors seem effective in at least about half of patients.


Introduction

Familial Mediterranean fever (FMF) is the most common monogenic autoinflammatory disease worldwide and is associated with mutations in the MEFV gene. The classic presentation combines febrile attacks and serositis. Patients also frequently report leg pain typically triggered by walking or prolonged standing, lasting for several hours despite rest and often associated with swelling and sometimes redness. This symptom responds less well to colchicine than other manifestations and is associated with severe FMF phenotypes, persistent inflammation, homozygosity for the MEFV M694V variant, and an increased risk of AA amyloidosis. This study evaluated the efficacy of anti‑interleukin‑1 therapy (anti‑IL‑1) on leg pain in FMF.


Patients and methods

This retrospective, single‑center Turkish study included adult FMF patients resistant to colchicine, treated with anti‑IL‑1 for at least 3 months and with colchicine at the maximum tolerated dose, and who had leg pain that pre‑dated the start of anti‑IL‑1. The control group was a historical cohort of FMF patients with leg pain who had not received anti‑IL‑1. Variables assessed included demographics, homozygosity for the M694V variant, leg pain, and quality of life.


Results

A total of 27 long‑term anti‑IL‑1–treated patients with leg pain (23 canakinumab, 4 anakinra) were compared with 99 patients from the historical cohort. These anti‑IL‑1 patients had more severe disease, with more frequent attacks prior to anti‑IL‑1 (50/year), homozygous MEFV M694V in 55%, lower‑limb arthritis during FMF flares in 85%, a higher mean colchicine dose (2.6 mg/day), and AA amyloidosis in 11%. Leg pain was bilateral, triggered by prolonged standing or walking, and resolved after several hours of lying down. Under anti‑IL‑1, attack frequency decreased to a mean of 9/year and inter‑critical CRP normalized in 50% of patients. Improvement in leg pain was reported in 52% of patients. An association between quality of life and leg pain was observed only in anti‑IL‑1–treated patients, likely because the symptom had previously been masked by inflammatory attacks.


Discussion

Leg pain improved in only about half of patients, but the cohort had particularly severe FMF. In the literature, MRI studies have shown signs of spondyloarthritis or occult enthesitis in some patients with leg pain. The mediators of these conditions are TNF‑α and IL‑17 more than IL‑1, which may explain lack of efficacy in some. Limitations include the retrospective design, small sample size, and missing data. Canakinumab is very expensive and should not be prescribed as first‑line therapy.

 
 
 

La protéine C-réactive est plus adaptée que l’amyloïde sérique A pour surveiller les crises et les périodes sans crise dans les maladies auto-inflammatoires systémiques

Abstract

Background: With their broad presentations and no global biomarker to discriminate crises and attack-free periods, Systemic Auto-Inflammatory Diseases (SAID) are difficult to manage. This study assessed Serum Amyloid A (SAA), C-reactive protein (CRP) and serum calprotectin as potential biomarkers to monitor patients with SAID.


Method: SAA (already studied in Familial Mediterranean Fever (FMF)), CRP and serum calprotectin were measured on SAID adult patients from Juvenile Inflammatory Rheumatism (JIR) cohort during their follow-up visits between 2020 and 2022. Crises and attack-free periods were clinically determined.


Results: 96 measures, mainly from FMF (43 %) and Unclassified SAID (USAID) (37 %) patients were included. Using ROC curves, a threshold with sensitivity and specificity of/over 75 % was determined for SAA (9 mg/L) and CRP (9 mg/L) but not for serum calprotectin, not investigated further. With this threshold, the results were similar in FMF and USAID patients' subgroups. SAA and CRP showed a positive correlation with crises and attack-free periods in SAID patients (r = 0.4796, p < 0.001 and r = 0.5525, p < 0.001, respectively) as in FMF and USAID patients, with no significant difference between both markers in diagnosis value and ROC curves Area Under Curve (AUC) (p = 0.32). Only the CRP results were not influenced by obesity.


Conclusion: SAA and CRP can discriminate crisis and attack-free periods in our cohort of SAID patients mainly composed of FMF and USAID patients. However, only CRP can be used regardless of body mass index. It is the first report of common biomarkers for all SAID, including USAID patients, with CRP widely accessible in routine worldwide.




 
 
 
bottom of page