Happy New Year 2026, A new year to advance autoinflammation, together

The entire CEREMAIA Tenon team sends you our best wishes for the new year.

The past year has been rich in exchanges, scientific progress, and collaborations around autoinflammatory diseases, Familial Mediterranean Fever (FMF), VEXAS syndrome, AA amyloidosis, and other rare diseases. Above all, it has been marked by a shared commitment: to better understand these complex diseases and improve patient care in a concrete way.

In 2026, we will continue this commitment by:

• Developing clinical, biological, and genetic research,

• Elaborating and sharing international recommendations,

• Strengthening patient education programs,

• Continuing accessible information initiatives for patients and their families.

• We warmly thank all patients, care teams, associations, and our national and international partners for their trust and collaboration throughout the year.

May this new year bring progress, hope, and shared projects for the benefit of rare diseases and autoinflammation.

Wishing you a wonderful year ahead.

The CEREMAIA Team – Tenon Hospital, AP-HP / Sorbonne University

Vacuoles, E1 enzyme, X-linked, autoinflammatory, somatic (VEXAS) syndrome: A comprehensive review of cases across different ethnicities

First author: Yixiang Yves-Jean Zhu

Journal: European Journal of Internal Medicine

Reference: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejim.2025.05.023

Vacuoles, E1 enzyme, X-linked, autoinflammatory, somatic (VEXAS) syndrome is a rare autoinflammatory disease associated with somatic pathogenic variants in the UBA1 gene. First described in 2020, it has since been reported in many countries, but its distribution across the world remained unclear. We conducted a literature review between October 2020 and April 2025, identifying more than 670 cases across 32 countries and 4 continents. Among patients with documented origins, several ethnic groups were represented, including Caucasian, East and South Asian, Middle Eastern, and South American. These findings confirm that VEXAS syndrome diverse ethnic backgrounds and has a broad worldwide distribution. It is therefore crucial to consider VEXAS in patients with compatible symptoms, regardless of their country or ancestry, to avoid diagnostic delays.

(VEXAS) syndrome: A comprehensive review of cases across different ethnicities.pdf

Download PDF • 1.82MB

VEXAS syndrome: what can we learn from France's experience with azacitidine?

Article title: Efficacy and safety of azacitidine for VEXAS syndrome: a large-scale retrospective study from FRENVEX

First author: Vincent Jachiet

Journal: Blood

Link to the article: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40373272/

Author of the abstract: Philippe Mertz

Three key points to remember:

1. Azacitidine is an effective treatment option for VEXAS syndrome even without associated myelodysplasia, with simultaneous effects on inflammation, cytopenias, and the UBA1 clone.

2. The response is often delayed and requires prolonged exposure (≥6 cycles) before evaluation. Adverse effects, particularly infectious ones, occur mainly in the first 3 cycles of treatment. Discontinuation of AZA leads to relapse in the majority of cases, suggesting a suspensive rather than curative effect.

3. Molecular monitoring (UBA1 VAF) allows for objective assessment of clonal response and could become a biomarker for monitoring this disease.

   
   

VEXAS syndrome is an acquired monogenic autoinflammatory disease associated with somatic mutations in the UBA1 gene. Patients present with a wide spectrum of severe inflammatory manifestations and cytopenias, which may be associated with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). Treatment is mainly based on corticosteroids, with frequent corticosteroid dependence despite associated sparing therapy with targeted therapies (anti-IL-6, anti-JAK, etc.) that have inconsistent efficacy. Azacitidine (AZA), a hypomethylating agent used in MDS, has shown potential in VEXAS, but published data remain limited.

This is a retrospective multicenter study conducted in France by the FRENVEX group, including 88 patients with genetically confirmed VEXAS who received at least one cycle of AZA between 2009 and 2024.

In this study, inflammatory response was defined as both clinical and biological improvement in systemic manifestations, including reduction in inflammatory symptoms and sustained decrease in biological markers such as CRP. The hematologic response followed the 2018 International Working Group criteria for MDS and corresponded to a significant improvement in cytopenias, including an increase in hemoglobin, platelets, or neutrophils, or a reduction in transfusion requirements. Finally, the molecular response was established on the basis of at least a 25% reduction in the mutational burden (VAF) of the UBA1 variant, assessed by targeted sequencing during treatment. Treatment side effects were described according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 5.0).

Inflammatory, hematological, and molecular responses were evaluated, as well as tolerance, regardless of the presence of associated MDS (present in 80%).

The main results of this study show:

• A partial or complete inflammatory response observed in 61% of patients (41% at 6 months, 54% at 12 months). The median response time was sometimes delayed (>6 cycles).

• A hematological response with improvement in hemoglobin in 65% and platelet count in 77%, with clinical benefit in terms of cytopenias and transfusion requirements.

• A molecular response with at least a 25% reduction in UBA1 mutation burden was observed in 65% of patients, correlating with the clinical response.

• Severe adverse events (grade III and IV) occurred in 60% of patients, mainly infections (34%) and cytopenias (36%), occurring predominantly in the first 3 cycles.

• 75% of patients relapse after stopping AZA (median duration of treatment-free period of 3.1 years), but resumption of treatment is effective in 80% of cases.

This study supports the use of AZA as first-line treatment in patients with VEXAS syndrome and severe cytopenias, or as second-line treatment in cases of failure of anti-inflammatory biotherapies, even in the absence of associated MDS. Treatment-related adverse effects, particularly infections, appear to occur mainly during the first 3 cycles of treatment. Prospective studies are needed to confirm its positioning and optimize the therapeutic strategy.